题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
London Underground
The world’s first subway was built in London in 1863. At the time,the government was looking for a way to reduce traffic problems in the city of London. The poor areas of the city were so crowded with people that it was almost impossible for horse carriages to get through. The city officials were interested in trying to make it possible for workers to live outside of London and travel easily to work each day. If people had a cheap and convenient way that they could depend on to go to and from work, they would relocate their homes outside of the city. This would help ease(减轻) the pressure of too many people living in the poor parts of London. From these problems,the idea of the London Underground,the first subway system,was born.
The plans for building the Underground met with several problems and delays,but the fast track was finally opened in January 1863. A steam train pulled the cars along the fast underground track which was 6 kilometers (3. 7 miles) long. About 30,000 people got on the subway the first day. Riders were treated to comfortable seats (standing up while the train was moving was not allowed), and pleasant decorations inside each of the cars. However, the smoke from the engine soon filled the air in the tunnels with ash and soot(煤灰), as well as chemical gases. Fans had to be put in the tunnels later to keep the air clean enough for people to breathe. Even with its problems,riding in the Underground did catch on. It carried 9 million riders in its first year.
A. Traffic jams and pollution. |
B. Population and pollution.
|
C. Overcrowding and traffic jams.
|
D. The poverty and subway problems. |
A. It made the tunnels larger. |
B. It put fans in the tunnels. |
C. It cleaned the chemical gases in the tunnels. |
D. It reduced the number of passengers riding in the train. |
A. be troublesome |
B. become popular and fashionable
|
C. keep up with |
D. seize |
A. To relocate the workers’ homes outside London,the government built the subway. |
B. There were so many problems and delays that in the 18th century the first subway opened. |
C. The subway greatly eased the pressure of traffic. |
D. There were not enough seats for the passengers the first day the subway opened. |
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
In todayˈs world of smart phones and laptops, most people have at least one time-telling thing with them. Since these digital products are so common, is time running out for the 500-year-old watch? According to some consumers, the answer is yes. New Jersey teenager Charlie Wollman says a watch is “an extra piece of equipment with no necessary function.” Many young adults think so and use their smart phones to tell time. It is said that fewer young people wear watches today than ten years ago. As a result, some people say that the watch industry is at a crossroads.
However, watchmakers optimistically say that watches redeem(挽回)popularity when consumers reach their 20s and 30s. By then, they are willing to spend money on a quality watch that doesn’t just keep good time. Fifty years ago, watchmakers took pride in their products’ accuracy. But in recent years, the watch industry has changed itself into an accessory(配饰) business. And today, the image a watch conveys has become more important than the time it tells.
“Complications” — features that go beyond simple timekeeping — are an important part of a watch’s image. Today’s watches offer lots of features that meet almost any personality. These features include compasses, USB drivers, and even other functions that measure the effectiveness of golf swings!
Creativity also plays a key role in designing today’s watches. For example, Japanese watchmaker Tokyoflash makes watches that don’t even look like watches. The company’s popular Shinshoku model uses different color lights to tell time. It looks more like a fashionable bracelet(手镯)than a watch.
Whether a watch conveys fashion sense, creative talent or a love of sports, consumers want their watches to stand out. Nowadays, everyone has the same kind of little things in their bags, so people want to make a statement with what’s on their wrists. Will this interest in wrist fashion last? Only time will tell!
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
Everybody in this world is different from one another.But do you know that understanding differences can help you better manage your money?
As we grow up,we gradually develop a set of our own values or beliefs. These are influenced by society, our family,the education we receive and so on.Once this value system is set up,itˈs not easy to change later in life.
Financial experts say that everyone also has their own belief of how to manage their finances.This is part of our value system and it has a great impact on the way we look after our money.
According to our different values,experts put us in three categories.They are:the ant,the cricket(蟋蟀) and the snail(蜗牛).
The ant works first
Just like ants who work heart and soul in summer in order to store food for winter,these people donˈt care about enjoying the moment. They work very hard and save money they earn so that they can enjoy life when they get old and retire. The ant loves to save but they could make more out of their money if they were willing to invest in some funds and stocks with low risk.
The cricket fun first
The cricket wants to enjoy everything now and doesnˈt think too much about the future. They even borrow money when they really want something. Many young people now belong to this group.These people have little savings.When they get old,they might have problems.They should learn to save and buy insurance.
The snail lives under pressure
The snail refers to people who make life difficult for themselves. They take big long term loans from the bank in order to buy things such as luxury houses. They are happy to take big loans even though they are not sure whether they can afford it.This can cause problems in the future. They should plan more carefully.
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
For years I struggled and fought with the bird’s nest that sat on top of my head—my Medusa (神话中的蛇发女妖) hair, a composition of frizz (鬈发) and giant ringlets (垂下的长鬈发) that in no way could be tamed.
Growing up in a Russian-Jewish home with parents who thought North American styling products were similar to illegal substances such as heroin, I was never allowed to put them in my hair.
“Why buy gel (凝胶)? Your hair is so beautiful naturally, ” my mother would say. However, from boys not wanting to kiss me when we played spin the bottle in Grade 7 to being called “the mop”, I suffered for my hair.
When I got to university, I believed my frizzy hair was something that stood between me and everything—finding an internship (实习期), getting a boyfriend.
Then, in my second year, a miracle happened. I was asked to be a hair model for Japanese hair straightening, a process by which the molecules (分子) of my curls would be broken and reset in a straight position. I was the perfect candidate, the hairdresser told me. Although there are rumours about how hair relaxing can damage the scalp (头皮), for the next five years I didn’t find them to be true.
However, there was extreme damage done to my wallet. To keep up the straightening cost $700 every six months, and that was considered cheap. While some people thought I was crazy, I was willing to do anything to never again feel like that bored, frizzy-headed girl in Grade 7. But when I moved out of my parents’ house at age 26 and rented an apartment, the upkeep of my image became too costly. I couldn’t hide from my inner Medusa any longer. It was time to hug her and let her fly.
Seeking an alternative to my high-end habit, I turned to Google. After hours of searching, I hit upon a “curly haired” salon, a place designed for girls like me who were at their wits’ end. Although I bought the service called the “Curly-Doo”, I suspected I’d have the same mop at the end of the appointment.
I dragged my feet so hard getting there that I arrived 45 minutes late. I secretly hoped they would turn me away and give me the excuse I needed to justify the expense of relaxing again. Instead, my stylist simply said: “You are very late. Flip your head over.”
As my head was dipped in a tub full of freezing-cold water, then generously slathered with a jelly-like substance, I wondered what I had got myself into.
“Do you really think this will work?” I asked the stylist, Jacquai. “My curls are a lost cause.”
“No curly hair is hopeless,” she replied. “They just haven’t found a way to work with it, that’s all.”
After the hour was over, Jacquai had completed her work. She had styled my hair using only her hands, water and a mixture of organic potions.
I couldn’t believe what I was seeing in the mirror: a naturally curly, Medusa-free me.
According to Jacquai, 75 percent of the population have a wave or curl in their hair and don’t know what to do with it. Men cut theirs short. Women flat-iron theirs to death.
When I browse through a beauty magazine or take the subway to work, it makes me sad to see so many people repressing their natural beauty.
Since I tamed my locks (头发), my world has changed. I have always been outgoing, but these days I seem to be more outspoken and confident than ever.
On top of that, friends and co-workers tell me I am looking better than ever, but they can’t tell the source of the change. I don’t need to tell them. My Medusa hair sways and speaks for herself.
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
The French have always loved Apple. Its elegant products and smart operating system, and its struggles against IBM and Microsoft in the 1980s, are especially appealing in a country that prides itself on being fashionable, clever and revolutionary. Apple’s two stores in central Paris lie in locations that are dear to French hearts — under the Louvre and directly opposite the Opera.
But the love affair is fading — in official circles at any rate — as concern grows that the technology giant’s market control does harm to a business in which French companies have been successful: designing applications for mobile devices. The government has complained Apple’s eviction (逐出) from its application store of a popular product developed by a French start-up firm — AppGratis. AppGratis offers its users one free application a day, charging developers for making products known to a wider audience.
Simon Dawlat, the boss of AppGratis thinks the application performs a valuable service in providing “a continuous stream of editorial picks” of the highest quality from the complex world of applications. Around 12 million people have downloaded AppGraits, he says, and perhaps a quarter of them at least consider the chosen application each day. First marketed outsideFrancein 2012, AppGraits has at times been the most popular free entertainment download for devices running Apple’s iOS operating system in 78 countries including the United States, according to App Annie, a market-research firm. In early 2013 AppGratis had raised more than $13 million for an expansion that has now been put on hold.
Apple says AppGratis disobeyed its bans on promoting other publishers’ products and on using “push” notifications (通知) for paid marketing. Apple dislikes applications that serve as shop-fronts for other ones. It worries that “app-discovery” products can help developers with deep pockets move their applications up the league tables and disturb the market. So it is rather puzzling that a version of AppGratis for iPads was approved less than a week before the mobile-phone version was evicted from the application store, and that other app-discovery applications are still available there. Perhaps AppGratis was growing too popular too quickly and that was its real fault.
Fleur Pellerin,France’s digital economy minister, blamed Apple on April 11th for its cruel treatment of AppGratis and spoke of tightening the regulation of giant Internet firms, in France and at European Union level. ‘The country’s competition authority is looking into the relationship between app stores — Google’s no less than Apple’s—and developers. The French have a lengthening list of grievances (抱怨) against the Internet giants including their failure to pay serious taxes, the refusal of Microsoft’s Skype to register as a telecoms operator and Twitter’s refusing to name those behind an outburst of racists. Ms Pellerin may not manage to cut them down to size; others have tried and failed. But for Apple and France, at least, it is looking increasingly like the end of the affair.
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
(1) A. A | B. B | C. C | D. D | E. E |
(2) A. A | B. B | C. C | D. D | E. E |
(3) A. A | B. B | C. C | D. D | E. E |
(4) A. A | B. B | C. C | D. D | E. E |
(5) A. A | B. B | C. C | D. D | E. E |
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
A. curious | B. tired | C. awful | D. funny |
A. apologise in a serious manner |
B. tell the receiver to ignore the error |
C. learn to write the name correctly |
D. send a short notice to everyone |
A. Try offering other choices. |
B. Avoid further involvement. |
C. Meet other staff members. |
D. Make a light-hearted apology. |
A. By promising not to offend the receiver again. |
B. By seeking support from the receiver's friends. |
C. By asking the receiver to control his anger. |
D. By talking to the receiver face to face. |
A. Defining email errors. |
B. Reducing email mistakes. |
C. Handling email accidents. |
D. Improving email writing. |
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
D
The sharing economy,represented by companies like Airbnb or Uber,is the latest fashion craze. But many supporters have overlooked the reality that this new business model is largely based on escaping regulations and breaking the law.
Airbnb is an internet-based service that allows people to rent out spare rooms to strangers for short stays. Uber is an intender taxi service that allows thousands of people to answer ride requests with their own cars. There are hundreds of other such services.
The good thing about the sharing economy is that it promotes the use of underused resources. Millions of people have houses or apartments with empty rooms,and Airbnb allows them to profit from these rooms while allowing guests a place to stay at prices that are often far less than those charged by hotels. Uber offers prices that are competitive with standard taxi prices and their drivers are often much quicker and more trustworthy.
But the downside of the sharing economy has gotten much less attention. Most cities and states both tax and regulate hotels,and the tourists who stay in hotels are usually an important source of tax income. But many of Airbnbˈs customers are not paying the taxes required under the law.
Airbnb can also raise issues of safety for its customers and trouble for hostsˈ neighbors. Hotels are regularly inspected to ensure that they are not fire traps and that they donˈt form other risks for visitors. Airbnb hosts face no such inspections.
Since Airbnb is allowing people to escape taxes and regulations,the company is simply promoting thefts. Others in the economy will lose by bearing an additional tax burden or being forced to live next to an apartment unit with a never-ending series of noisy visitors.
The same story may apply with Uber. Uber is currently in disputes over whether its cars meet the safety and insurance requirements imposed on standard taxis. Also,if Uber and related services flood the market,they could harm all taxi driversˈ ability to earn a minimum wage.
This downside of the sharing needs to be taken seriously,but that doesnˈt mean the current tax and regulatory structure is perfect.
A. It is a global trend. |
B. It is beyond regulations. |
C. It draws on spare resources. |
D. It brings in modest profits. |
A. They are not regularly inspected. |
B. They are likely to commit thefts. |
C. They are not allowed to escape taxes. |
D. They can be noisy to hostsˈ neighbours. |
A. Whether it guarantees customersˈ safety. |
B. Whether it provides reliable services. |
C. Whether it lowers customersˈ expenses. |
D. Whether it can compete with standard taxis. |
A. Existing regulations and laws. |
B. Necessary improvements of current laws. |
C. Further development of Airbnb and Uber. |
D. More downsides of Airbnb and Uber. |
题型:阅读理解 题类:其他 难易度:难
年份:2017
When you hear the word “recycling”. what comes to your mind? The color green or global warming?
What if I were to tell you there is a dark side of recycling? A type of recycling that does more than good. The dark side of recycling has nothing to do with the environment but rather has a lot to do with the recycling of ideas.
Environmental unrest is not the only trouble we must face. Idea pollution is quickly becoming widespread across the online world.
Think about it. When was the last time you read an original blog post? I’m guessing it has been quite a while. Why do you think top bloggers of today win so much respect? Do you think they recycle their ideas? With each recycled idea the online world becomes much more polluted. Used content contributes to the ever increasing mass of digital smog.
The first step to reduce pollution is simple: stop recycling. When you stop recycling, you will then be forced to take up the task of creating from your own ideas. When you recycle an excellent idea, it soon becomes good. When you recycle a good idea, it soon becomes just OK. The chain continues until the key part of what used to make the idea good is saturated, leaving you nothing but a pile of mess.
In order not to pollute, your ideas must go beyond “just recycled’’. Your ideas must stand out from the pollution of the web. For your voice and talent to be heard and seen, you must go far beyond the standard copy of your neighbours’ ideas.
For the next week, make a promise not to recycle. Let your ideas flourish and flow. Believe in your ability to create, because the death of recycling starts with YOU.
A. They are not worth much respect. |
B. They tend to express many fresh ideas. |
C. They often recycle their ideas. |
D. They make good use of others’ ideas.
|
A. many and good |
B. many but not good |
C. useful but not enough |
D. beneficial
|
A. top bloggers |
B. net researchers |
C. environmental polluters |
D. common bloggers
|
A. to remind people to pay attention to environmental protection... |
B. to prove that the web environment is becoming worse and worse |
C. to call on people to write online more creatively instead of repeating |
D. to warn people not to pollute our web environment with bad words |